It's a bird, It's a plane, It's "Super W"!

According to Liberals, George W. Bush is the most powerful ex-President planet Earth has ever seen. For 18 months and counting (since "W" left office) everything negative in American life continues to be his fault. And on the rare occasion when it's not his fault, it’s Rush Limbaugh's fault. Amazingly, as of today, absolutely nothing that has occurred over the past 18 months can be attributed to Barack Obama or the Democratically controlled House and Senate. Yet, Obama is the proud owner of many "firsts" as President (none of them good). His current record of blaming his predecessor throughout the first 18 months of his administration is unprecedented. At what point will governing the country become Obama's responsibility? It was a rhetorical question my dear mindless Liberal friends, I know the answer. Never.

You just can't make this stuff up folks. Now we have Maxine Waters blaming "Super W" for her little ethics problem.

And if you thought that was rich you have CBS and The Washington Post blaming "Super W" for Al and Tipper Gore splitting up. 

And here is my personal favorite. You might recall that when Scott Brown won the "Ted Kennedy Seat" in the Senate, President Obama said that Brown’s victory was the result of the same voter anger that propelled Obama into office in 2008. People were still angry about George W. Bush and the policies of the past 8 years, and they wanted change. There you have it. The Liberals in Massachusetts were so angry at "Super W", that after decades of voting Liberal icon, "Chappaquiddick Ted" into office, they voted Republican. Makes perfect sense to me. It is this type of thought process that causes some to conclude Liberalism is a mental disorder.

If you ever want to make the veins in a Liberals neck bulge, turn purple and pulsate, mention the term "intellectual honesty" during your next friendly, spirited political conversation. They hate this term almost as much as "Super W" himself. Why? Because none of their insane Liberal ideas and beliefs contain any trace of intellectual honesty. Not a single grain. This entire strategy of spending an entire Presidential term blaming the ex-President is a prime example. 

As we have painfully witnessed over the past 18 months, a President can implement a great number of things when his Party controls both the Congress and the Senate. This perfect storm is doing to our entire nation what Katrina did do a small portion of the Gulf Coast. Liberals took control of the Congress and Senate in 2006. Presidents do not and can not pass laws. This is apparently a news flash to Liberals. If you will recall, the economy started going south in 2007. It only took "Bawny Fwrank" (Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee) and his Liberal cronies 1 year to set the stage for what became the devastating sub-prime mortgage catastrophe. I do not need to list the devastating bills that have been passed over the past 18 months (most in the dark of night, a Friday night usually). If the Liberals are not defeated in November, you can expect the carnage to continue for another two years. 

It is examples like these that make Liberals twitch like Bill Clinton at a lesbian Jenny Craig rally. You see, if intellectual honesty were applied you would have to ask your Liberal friend about the absolute disaster Ronald Reagan inherited from the formerly "worst President of all time". Yes, the "peanut farmer" has to be pretty excited that he is only two years away from never being referred to as the worst President in history ever again. Go ahead, research it. Did Ronald Reagan spend his first 18 minutes, let alone 18 months publicly blaming Carter? Nope. He was too busy getting the capitalist engine firing on all cylinders and dismantling the USSR without a shot being fired.

Do I need to again list all of the terrorist attacks that occurred during the Clinton administration? Of course I do, that was rhetorical too. Other than bombing an aspirin factory and killing a janitor, Clinton did nothing in response to terrorism. If only he would have taken Islamic terrorists as seriously as he did a religious nut in Waco, Texas, he could have slaughtered as many terrorists as he did innocent American children. But I digress. Yet only eight short months after "Super W" took office the terrorists who had enjoyed eight years of honing their skills unabated by the Clinton administration made their big play. Did "Super W" spend the next 18 months blaming Clinton? Nope. He was too busy exterminating the Islamic cockroaches that should have been exterminated during the preceding eight years (so that 3000 Americans who are dead today might still be alive).

Not to be a nuisance but I thought I would throw this out just to see that "deer in the headlights" look Liberals get when blindsided by facts: 

During the eight years "Super W" was in office (during 9/11 and war) the national debt rose from 5.7 trillion dollars to 10.6 trillion dollars. For you Liberals, that would be 500 billion per year on average. 

During the first 18 months of Obama-the-Messiah, the national debt has risen from 10.6 trillion dollars to 13.3 trillion dollars. You do the math. Oh, you're a Liberal? My bad. That would be 2.7 TRILLION in 18 months. What do you say to that? Ready? All together now... IT'S GEORGE BUSH'S FAULT!!! Amen.

When "Super W" left office, unemployment was at 7.2%. Today, it stands at 9.7% and if you consider those who have given up looking for work or those who have settled for part time work during this economic disaster, the number approaches 19%. 

I guess I can understand Obama's plan to continue blaming "Super W".